The General Debate (GD) of the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA 81) ended Monday and did not always disappoint when it came to the efficient delivery of photo-ops, headlines, soundbites, and high drama.
Correspondingly,
there must have been a separate cargo flight to transport signed, soon-to-be-forgotten
memoranda of understanding, agreements, and other documents that made it
through the prolific press release mill back to home territories, including ours.
Don’t
get me wrong, bilateral diplomacy matters – however ad hoc, opportunistic, or
gratuitously amplified via public communication channels. The term
“speed-dating” has been used more than once to describe such interactions.
A leader
attending a high-profile meeting, energetically delivering a speech or stomping
in and out of the hall may generate media coverage. But a 15-minute private
exchange and a handshake in a corridor has the potential to meaningfully change
things. So, I am not dismissing its possible importance.
If,
for example, the Persad-Bissessar/ Rodríguez speed date resulted
in genuine infatuation and open declarations of love, that is not an easily
dismissible outcome, however temporal. Click!
In
fact, that meeting lived up to and even exceeded its billing as a decisive,
made-for-media encounter minus mention of the contentious “res non grata” (to
coin my own idiom employing the Latin ‘res’ for “thing”) Venezuela-plus-Essequibo
brooch worn by Rodríguez).
What
is important now is what gets consummated at the second and third and fourth
dates.
Last
week I drew attention to the fact that UNGA 81 included several “High-Level”
meetings on what, in this neck of the woods, must be considered of great
priority – even more than main stage grandiloquence and posturing.
![]() |
| Second Floor Flag Hall (United Nations) |
Barbados
represented the Climate Vulnerable Forum (CVF) – a group of developing
countries deemed to be highly vulnerable to climate change. Jamaica and St
Vincent and the Grenadines were also there in their own right and addressed the
meeting.
On
the margins that day, with climate concerns in mind, the Pacific Islands Forum
(PIF) and Caricom “formalised their partnership through a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU).” Click!
The
fact is UNGA 81 was, outside of the main hall, the setting for substantive
conversations on issues that go directly to our collective and individual
interests - climate finance, adaptation, energy transition, resilience,
information integrity and, critically, sea-level rise.
For T&T,
these are not obscure UN issues or needless burdens founded on demonic assertions
of a climate crisis. They involve issues of sovereignty, maritime space,
coastal communities, infrastructure, fisheries, tourism, water security, and
development finance.
I
may have missed it but have not received anything to suggest that consideration
of such issues was newsworthy enough to make it through our official
communication infrastructure or had in fact been rigorously explored.
The climate-finance
discussions, for example, got down to nitty-gritty examination of lingering
questions regarding the cost of capital to address low carbon transition
issues, the expansion of concessional finance, debt, and the conversion of
national adaptation plans into financeable programmes.
I am
aware we were present at the High-Level Meeting on Sea-Level Rise and raised
some key points about full capitalisation of the Loss and Damage Fund. But
where were the photos? The press releases?
Perhaps
the PM’s comment on the matter was not meant to be overshadowed when she
declared at the GD: “Trinidad and Tobago brings a distinctive perspective as we
understand that climate resilience, energy security, affordability and economic
development must advance together.”
At COP30
in Belém last November, T&T was also among those calling for predictable,
accessible, and adequate climate finance to bridge the gap between ambition and
implementation. Click!
Yet,
as currently applies, citizens should not have to reconstruct the substance of our
international engagement last week from UN transcripts and other obscure
documents.
Admittedly,
there was little local journalism on this, and neither the propagandists nor
usual trolls are typically interested in such boring details.
Even
so, a photograph tells us who met whom. A signing ceremony tells us that
something was signed. But serious public diplomacy should also tell citizens
what was negotiated, what was sought, what was committed, what was obtained and
what happens next.

No comments:
Post a Comment