At the current
rate, there will come a time when the people who require the greatest
protection on grounds of the universality of human rights will begin
dismissively forging alternative pathways to justice, peace, freedom, and
equality.
In my view,
generally muted national, regional, and global observance of Human Rights Day
last Sunday signalled a state of cognitive dissonance induced by cynically
routinised breaches in the letter and spirit of enshrined rights of all
varieties.
I would like to
think that when the world assembled in 1948 to declare the universal,
inalienable nature of human rights and to prescribe their tangible expression
it was expected that the ravages of global conflict at that time would have
provided an impetus that was urgent and seen to be indispensable.
Alongside the
civil and political rights eventually came a vast suite of economic, social,
and cultural rights. National constitutions and laws were codifying them.
Systems of justice were being crafted to interpret them. Civil society was
inculcating rights as foundational values for advocacy and change. More than 60
international human instruments have been created and adopted.
Our leaders
were all over the planet signing pieces of paper and delivering speeches and
press releases. We were seeing some as exemplars and others as reckless
violators and pariahs. There was the institutional entrenching of values deemed
to be important pillars of true development –intangibles that belong as much to
statute as to stature and status.
Yet, four days
ago, some of the loudest state voices on such imperatives were found, when thin
outer coatings were stripped, to be actively presiding over violations of the
rights of children, military non-combatants, the poor, the displaced, the
different, and the weak.
This is no
esoteric parable. Genocide, invasions, threats to territorial integrity,
systemic discrimination, state-sanctioned murder and violence – all there in
real time before all our eyes.
Despite this, our
Caribbean region, whose peoples have been collectively victimised through
historical antecedent by the issues frontally addressed by the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights has been slow to consider recognition of human
rights as being the stuff of official instinct and habit.
Witness active
resistance to the notion of all rights as an entitlement of all people. Our
countries neither officially nor informally recognise such a truism.
Had the
contrary been the case, current attitudes toward the LGBT community, migrants,
reproductive rights, freedom of expression, and the rights of the vulnerable
among us would have been settled matters of public policy and life.
It would have
also helped us come to terms, far less painfully, with current regional and
global developments that require an understanding of territorial integrity
especially as it relates to the rights of inhabitants, deadly aggression at
times of illicit collective punishment, discrimination on account of race and
ethnicity, and the more stringent application of civil and political rights as
preconditions to the achievement of economic, social, and cultural rights.
We could have
told there would have been this difficulty with countenancing such difficult
terrain. There is a sprinkling of special interest activism but too few
national umbrella organisations in our region (I think our Bar associations
should lead this, but they don’t) to capture these obligations within the
context of developmental objectives.
The Sustainable
Development Goals provided important pathways to understanding the connections,
but our countries have not yet taken the hint. For example (and I raise this
yet again), SDG 16 speaks to the promotion of “peaceful and inclusive
societies” for sustainable development through “access to justice for all”.
A key target
(16.10) promotes public access to information and the protection of fundamental
freedoms. The Global Forum for Media Development, of which I am a part, put up
a stout fight to have this target expressed. Caribbean countries (not T&T
so far) have also signed on to the EscazĂș Agreement on access to information
and public participation in environmental matters.
I am unaware of
a single political organisation in T&T that put Sunday aside to remind
their devotees about these things. Additionally, how many sermons in holy
places addressed them?
It seems to be
hardly a necessary annoyance at this time to let people know that there are
terrible things in the world today that could have been so much different had
people resolved to convert rights into durable habits of human conduct.