So, we observe World Press Freedom Day. It's usually only journalists who believe this has anything to
do with them. It always seems that so many people along the communication
spectrum do not understand that the interests of journalists and journalism run
so wide and deep in any society.
Much of this has to do with the fact that people don’t often
realise that good media practice is a social asset. Its value is way in excess
of the ability of the industry to thrive on the production of meaningful
content.
It was Washington Post journalist Paul Farhi who once argued,
in an obvious state of pique, that a generic, amorphous entity called “the
media” did not exist and that the label was in fact an all-purpose smear used
by people not moved by any obligation to make intelligent distinctions about
what they read, see or hear in the public space.
Today, in T&T, we suspect this to be a fact of our own
existence. Journalists have become used to the observations of both the
well-meaning and those inspired by ill-will that “the media” are capable of
stimulating utmost evil, despair and destruction.
Now, don’t get me wrong; all institutions such as these are
capable of causing harm. In fact, an overarching commitment of the journalist’s
creed implies a requirement to cause no harm.
But I have even heard and seen broadcasters and newspaper
columnists and others employing mass communication platforms complain about the
impact of “the media” on behaviour, on official policy, on the price of bread.
“The media”, of course, comprising everybody else except them.
There continues to be a kind of intellectual sloppiness which
renders people incapable of disaggregating media content and recognising the media’s
implicit complexity as the sum of many diverse, inclusionary and constituent
parts.
It is thus the role of those now committed to promotion of
media and information literacy – currently conceptualised as a discrete programme
under the banner of UNESCO – to begin the hard work of explaining to people that
while a media industry exists, and journalism remains a function of such an
industry in all its current manifestations, there is actually no such thing as
“the media” in the sense employed by many.
Confusion over the essential qualities of media also earns
special credits amid what is now being widely described as “fake news” – aka
propaganda or, more accurately, deliberate untruths implanted on mass
communication platforms seeking traction by the unsuspecting. The fact is, the
term is also an oxymoronic expression also meant to be a slur on journalism
with which you disagree.
It’s a phenomenon connected to the situation in which
opposition politicians somehow beome convinced that press freedom is a
requirement of modern society while their colleagues in government belatedly discover
a false balance between freedom and responsibility.
It is however true that to be responsible, you must first be
free. How, for example, can better journalism thrive in the absence of open
access to officially-held information? How can such information flow if
protections for those with information to share in the public interest do not
exist?
The freedom enlightened media legislation and regulation
bring can contribute more than anything else to responsible behaviour by
journalists and other media players.
Yesterday, the Media Institute of the Caribbean (MIC)
convened a regional training initiative in Jamaica for media professionals with
an interest in investigative journalism and those who are attempting to gain a
foothold in this special branch of the profession.
This is a singularly important exercise in the context of a
communication environment that does not routinely conduce to either openness with
the provision of information or to enthusiastic candour with the resulting
revelations.
This year’s global theme for WPFD is “Keeping Power in
Check: Media, Justice and The Rule of Law.” Within this is an open
acknowledgement of the need for more, not less, journalism and a better
understanding of what constitutes “the media” and all they purport to bring.
(First published in the T&T Guardian on May 2, 2018)
