The great hope of youth in pan - (not about journalism) first published in the T&T Guardian on February 7, 2018
* Panorama is the annual competition involving steelbands from all over the country. It is keenly contested with strong community support.
Every year, at Panorama competitions, we hear the best
steelbands in the world playing arrangements by the greatest arrangers on
instruments blended by the leading pan tuners anywhere on the planet. On the instruments
are the best players interpreting songs that could not have been composed
anywhere else.
In defiance of assertions even from the people who manage
the steelband movement, the young are streaming through the creative gates – as
players, composers and arrangers. We perhaps also need greater interest in pan
tuning – a lucrative pursuit with fewer than 100 competent tuners operating
professionally worldwide. Yes, worldwide!
Why then can’t we concede that pan, in all its aspects, is
the best thing we do in T&T and that we need to work much harder on activating
its inert potential as a social and economic good?
It’s almost like the point I made about street food
entrepreneurship in T&T a few weeks ago – that familiarity and commonness
have conspired to generate private and official contempt.
I recall a discussion I had with the late, great journalist
Keith Smith as we walked along Independence Square in search of snacks around
1986 or 1987. “Keith,” I said. “Don’t you think we should stop focusing on oil (natural
gas wasn’t as important then as it is now) as the main driver of the economy
and pay greater attention to the economic value of pan?”
Silence. Then the terse response: “You think people will
take anybody on with that?” It was a response that belied his well-developed
views on the instrument as an agent of positive social and economic change, but
also pronounced, albeit provocatively, on the question of how we perceive of national
development and the factors that drive it.
Far more eloquent expression and a much better conceived
formulation of such an argument would later come from public intellectual,
Lloyd Best, who argued that the panyard offered a space capable of delivering
service both as an “economic zone” and as “an education plant.”
Best, of course, was all the while conscious of the fact
that deep-seated prejudices existed then, as they do now, against the steelband
movement, based on nonsenses about which I constantly remind people in this
column from week to week – the supposed “failed” status of one group, the need
for urban, middle class validation etc. and so forth.
Arima Angel Harps arranged by 23 year old Aviel Scanterbury |
The growing involvement of young people in the culture of
pan brings cause for great confidence, but is problematic because it runs against
the grain of the established developmental orthodoxy of our time which grants
limited space for innovation and the dimensions of human interactivity that
never existed before.
I constantly make the point among old-stagers like myself
that there is no comparison between the analog disciplines of our time and the
digital reality of today. This is important, I believe.
Today’s young people occupy dimensions provided by digital
space we 50 and 60 and 70 year olds never dreamt of in our youth (I turn 60
this year). The mindset is different. There is nothing obsessively linear about
their thought processes or in how they conceive of the things they create.
They are capable of occupying time and space in ways we never thought possible.
They are capable of occupying time and space in ways we never thought possible.
For this, our society applies punishment and estrangement
instead of encouragement and reward.
The young music arranger brings riffs, melodic twists and
harmonies to his/her craft that are borderless and defy the parameters of the
judges’ traditional score sheets. Too close to Panorama finals to get into the
details, but I have noticed the slow but changing tide in favour of the new.